In the investigation into the Federal Reserve and its chairman, Jerome Powell, in the United States, an important court decision has been made. But a federal court in Washington has definitively rejected the Justice Department’s attempt to reinstate grand jury subpoenas against the Fed.
U.S. – S S. In his ruling today, District Judge James Boasberg said the government’s reasons for rethinking the previous decision were “far from convincing.” In the past, two subpoenas had been dismissed by the court to the Federal Reserve’S board of governors and were filed for papers relating to a nearly $2. headquarters refurbishment project of 5 billion, 5 bnh.
During his ruling, Boasberg said that there was “very good evidence” of the subpoenAs were intended to pressure Powell rather than pursue a legitimate criminal investigation. The judge added ‘Powers on subpoenas are not unlimited and cannot be used to abuse. – ’.
Related News
JUST IN: U.S.-Iran Talks Have Stalled; Pakistan Talks May Be Canceled
A Justice Department investigation was launched after Powell testified before the Senate Banking Committee that he needed renovations to Marriner S. Several Federal Reserve buildings, including Eccles Building, . Originally estimated at $1, . The project cost increased from 9 billion to $2. The design changes, and higher costs of the , cost 5 billion.
In a strong criticism of the court’s decision, District of Columbia Attorney Jeanine Pirro strongly accused the judge of being an ‘activist’ and saying that the ruling weakened the grand jury’s ability to investigate the Fed.
According to Boasberg, in his ruling “the fundamental legal question of the subpoena was’real purpose’ of this crime; did it serve as an excuse or meant for Powell to reduce interest rates or resign? The court said that the government had not provided sufficient faith grounds for suspicion of a crime.
This development is seen as a new reflection of the long-standing tension between the Donald Trump administration and the Fed in the United States. During months, Trump has openly criticised Powell for not cutting down interest rates and is an aggressive criticism of it by Trump.
*This is not investment advice.
Thanks for reading Federal Court Deals Trump a Setback: Rejects Request to Reopen Lawsuit Against Powell and the Fed